Hi Robert,

cool .. Today I will work on the last remaining issue as I mentioned for the
variable LODs ( I am seeing some issues ). Then we should have it some sort
of solid state and will call again the community for tests ....

Thanks!
-Nick


On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Robert Osfield <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Nick,
>
> These changes fix the cracks I was seeing with the Nellis database.  I
> still see a warning on the console though.
>
> David's changes addressed an issue with clean up that he was seeing.
>
> Robert.
>
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > here are some changes. Tested with archives 2.0, 2.1, 2.2 ..   Can you
> give
> > them a try?
> >
> > Also I dont know what is the business with David's changes
> > -Nick
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Robert,
> >>
> >> I donty have handy the nellis archive. what I am seeing now with the
> >> archives from TV is solid work. I took in the code and the most
> suspitious
> >> place is the seam detection which I think is not quite right (the
> archives I
> >> work with are extended with new trpage nodes so this code is not int
> use).
> >> Could you place the Nellis db somewhere I can download it? I will have a
> >> look and will fix it
> >>
> >> Let me know
> >> -Nick
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Robert Osfield <
> [email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Nick,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the clean up, the code looks a lot cleaner now :-)
> >>>
> >>> I've merged the changes and checked them in to svn/trunk.
> >>>
> >>> After merging the changes I tested osgviewer against the old Nellis
> >>> demo database archive.txp and found two issues, one of which is
> >>> clearly a regression.  My test was:
> >>>
> >>>  cd Nellis
> >>>  osgviewer archive.txp
> >>>  # zoom into the see the model
> >>>
> >>> First issue, a warning emited to the console a made be related to a
> >>> recent merge of a submission last week on achive creation/destruction
> >>> from David Fries (r11999).  The warning on the console is:
> >>>
> >>> txp::ReaderWriterTXP::getArchive() error: archive id 1 not found:
> >>> "/archive.txp"
> >>> remove archive 1 size 0 result 1
> >>>
> >>> The second issue is that cracks are appearing between tiles when
> >>> zooming in.  This could be related to the above.  I reverted your
> >>> clean up changes and to see if they were causing the regression and
> >>> confirmed that they aren't, so the changes I've just merged don't look
> >>> like they are related at all to the two above issues.
> >>>
> >>> Are you seeing any of these issues?
> >>>
> >>> Robert.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> > Hi Robert,
> >>> >
> >>> > I went thru the TileMapper today very carefuly and I remove all the
> >>> > tileStack approach - it made everything simplier and I think more
> >>> > proper.
> >>> > Cleaned the code as well. It was tested on huge archive with many
> lods
> >>> > as
> >>> > well with variable lods. Fix attached.
> >>> >
> >>> > I swear, with this no more issues will be reported !
> >>> >
> >>> > Updated code attached. Please CI into svn, I will call again for
> >>> > testing
> >>> > (the community is silent though :-) .. is this so acient so noone is
> >>> > using
> >>> > it anymore? :)
> >>> >
> >>> > Cheers,
> >>> > -Nick
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov
> >>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Okay
> >>> >> -Nick
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Robert Osfield
> >>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Hi Nick,
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov
> >>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >>> > So, good time to call the community to do tests. If all ok, then
> I
> >>> >>> > clean it
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Could you do the call for testing and coordinate the thread as I've
> >>> >>> got a number of other issues to juggle with right now.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Cheers,
> >>> >>> Robert.
> >>> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> >>> osg-submissions mailing list
> >>> >>> [email protected]
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > osg-submissions mailing list
> >>> > [email protected]
> >>> >
> >>> >
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> osg-submissions mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>>
> >>>
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > osg-submissions mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> osg-submissions mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
>
_______________________________________________
osg-submissions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org

Reply via email to