There is another update coming which should fix archives with variable LODs
(kind a new thing in TerraVista .. well ... couple of years "new") that
wasn't be around 2003 when the TileMapper was originally written

-Nick


On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Robert,
>
> here are some changes. Tested with archives 2.0, 2.1, 2.2 ..   Can you give
> them a try?
>
> Also I dont know what is the business with David's changes
>
> -Nick
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  Hi Robert,
>>
>> I donty have handy the nellis archive. what I am seeing now with the
>> archives from TV is solid work. I took in the code and the most suspitious
>> place is the seam detection which I think is not quite right (the archives I
>> work with are extended with new trpage nodes so this code is not int use).
>> Could you place the Nellis db somewhere I can download it? I will have a
>> look and will fix it
>>
>> Let me know
>> -Nick
>>
>>
>>   On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Robert Osfield <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Nick,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the clean up, the code looks a lot cleaner now :-)
>>>
>>> I've merged the changes and checked them in to svn/trunk.
>>>
>>> After merging the changes I tested osgviewer against the old Nellis
>>> demo database archive.txp and found two issues, one of which is
>>> clearly a regression.  My test was:
>>>
>>>  cd Nellis
>>>  osgviewer archive.txp
>>>  # zoom into the see the model
>>>
>>> First issue, a warning emited to the console a made be related to a
>>> recent merge of a submission last week on achive creation/destruction
>>> from David Fries (r11999).  The warning on the console is:
>>>
>>> txp::ReaderWriterTXP::getArchive() error: archive id 1 not found:
>>> "/archive.txp"
>>> remove archive 1 size 0 result 1
>>>
>>> The second issue is that cracks are appearing between tiles when
>>> zooming in.  This could be related to the above.  I reverted your
>>> clean up changes and to see if they were causing the regression and
>>> confirmed that they aren't, so the changes I've just merged don't look
>>> like they are related at all to the two above issues.
>>>
>>> Are you seeing any of these issues?
>>>
>>> Robert.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov
>>>  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > Hi Robert,
>>> >
>>> > I went thru the TileMapper today very carefuly and I remove all the
>>> > tileStack approach - it made everything simplier and I think more
>>> proper.
>>> > Cleaned the code as well. It was tested on huge archive with many lods
>>> as
>>> > well with variable lods. Fix attached.
>>> >
>>> > I swear, with this no more issues will be reported !
>>> >
>>> > Updated code attached. Please CI into svn, I will call again for
>>> testing
>>> > (the community is silent though :-) .. is this so acient so noone is
>>> using
>>> > it anymore? :)
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > -Nick
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov
>>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Okay
>>> >> -Nick
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Robert Osfield
>>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi Nick,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov
>>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>> > So, good time to call the community to do tests. If all ok, then I
>>> >>> > clean it
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Could you do the call for testing and coordinate the thread as I've
>>> >>> got a number of other issues to juggle with right now.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Cheers,
>>> >>> Robert.
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> osg-submissions mailing list
>>> >>> [email protected]
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > osg-submissions mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> >
>>> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
>>> >
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> osg-submissions mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
>>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
osg-submissions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org

Reply via email to