Hi Robert, the loader was tested with archives with variable LODs and all seam to work well.
-Nick On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > cool .. Today I will work on the last remaining issue as I mentioned for > the variable LODs ( I am seeing some issues ). Then we should have it some > sort of solid state and will call again the community for tests .... > > Thanks! > -Nick > > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Robert Osfield > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Nick, >> >> These changes fix the cracks I was seeing with the Nellis database. I >> still see a warning on the console though. >> >> David's changes addressed an issue with clean up that he was seeing. >> >> Robert. >> >> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Robert, >> > >> > here are some changes. Tested with archives 2.0, 2.1, 2.2 .. Can you >> give >> > them a try? >> > >> > Also I dont know what is the business with David's changes >> > -Nick >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Robert, >> >> >> >> I donty have handy the nellis archive. what I am seeing now with the >> >> archives from TV is solid work. I took in the code and the most >> suspitious >> >> place is the seam detection which I think is not quite right (the >> archives I >> >> work with are extended with new trpage nodes so this code is not int >> use). >> >> Could you place the Nellis db somewhere I can download it? I will have >> a >> >> look and will fix it >> >> >> >> Let me know >> >> -Nick >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Robert Osfield < >> [email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi Nick, >> >>> >> >>> Thanks for the clean up, the code looks a lot cleaner now :-) >> >>> >> >>> I've merged the changes and checked them in to svn/trunk. >> >>> >> >>> After merging the changes I tested osgviewer against the old Nellis >> >>> demo database archive.txp and found two issues, one of which is >> >>> clearly a regression. My test was: >> >>> >> >>> cd Nellis >> >>> osgviewer archive.txp >> >>> # zoom into the see the model >> >>> >> >>> First issue, a warning emited to the console a made be related to a >> >>> recent merge of a submission last week on achive creation/destruction >> >>> from David Fries (r11999). The warning on the console is: >> >>> >> >>> txp::ReaderWriterTXP::getArchive() error: archive id 1 not found: >> >>> "/archive.txp" >> >>> remove archive 1 size 0 result 1 >> >>> >> >>> The second issue is that cracks are appearing between tiles when >> >>> zooming in. This could be related to the above. I reverted your >> >>> clean up changes and to see if they were causing the regression and >> >>> confirmed that they aren't, so the changes I've just merged don't look >> >>> like they are related at all to the two above issues. >> >>> >> >>> Are you seeing any of these issues? >> >>> >> >>> Robert. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov >> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> > Hi Robert, >> >>> > >> >>> > I went thru the TileMapper today very carefuly and I remove all the >> >>> > tileStack approach - it made everything simplier and I think more >> >>> > proper. >> >>> > Cleaned the code as well. It was tested on huge archive with many >> lods >> >>> > as >> >>> > well with variable lods. Fix attached. >> >>> > >> >>> > I swear, with this no more issues will be reported ! >> >>> > >> >>> > Updated code attached. Please CI into svn, I will call again for >> >>> > testing >> >>> > (the community is silent though :-) .. is this so acient so noone is >> >>> > using >> >>> > it anymore? :) >> >>> > >> >>> > Cheers, >> >>> > -Nick >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov >> >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Okay >> >>> >> -Nick >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Robert Osfield >> >>> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Hi Nick, >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov >> >>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> > So, good time to call the community to do tests. If all ok, then >> I >> >>> >>> > clean it >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Could you do the call for testing and coordinate the thread as >> I've >> >>> >>> got a number of other issues to juggle with right now. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Cheers, >> >>> >>> Robert. >> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> >>> osg-submissions mailing list >> >>> >>> [email protected] >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > _______________________________________________ >> >>> > osg-submissions mailing list >> >>> > [email protected] >> >>> > >> >>> > >> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> osg-submissions mailing list >> >>> [email protected] >> >>> >> >>> >> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org >> >> >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > osg-submissions mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > >> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> osg-submissions mailing list >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org >> > >
_______________________________________________ osg-submissions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
