-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/10/2015 12:17 AM, Tyge Løvset wrote: > Jan, Robert, > > I get the impression that both of you are not really that > interested in changing the Vec code at all.
Correct. > Jan, your suggestion to rather switch to the Eigen library, seems > to me a non-agile and drastic way to develop code. In fact, I am > not sure what you are suggesting here. Do you want to throw out the > current Vec API and use the Eigen instead? That would break > existing code all over the place, and seems unrealistic to me (up > to the point that it won't happen in any forseeable future). My entire point with Eigen was that if we were to replace the current code with templated code, then instead of rolling our own it would be better to consider using a complete, well developed library that does that, even if OSG uses only minor part of it. Reinventing the wheel is not good. Also why to stop at osg::Vec? Yeah, I completely agree that it could break a lot of stuff and it is probably not the best idea. I am certainly not advocating doing this now. > Or do you mean to make an adapter layer for the current API, which > utilizes the Eigen classes? I don't see a good reason for that > either, because OSG only uses a very limited part of the > functionalty of Eigen, No, that wouldn't make much sense to do. Regards, Jan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iD8DBQFVUIVXn11XseNj94gRAlimAKCfjtkUXOh7tvkHNmvDVUfJN5fyKgCg4oQ4 xMm1/gj/eBy45rvbFzvQ/TY= =6YaS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ osg-submissions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
