Hi Guy and J.P,
Still struggling to keep up, partly cause I'm a bit cold on the
subject, and partly because I've gone done with a rather pesky cold...
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:47 AM, J.P. Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Selecting glDrawBuffer/s according to the attachment map does make
> sense; however, Like Guy, I'm not sure if multiple attachments would
> always imply the intention to use MRT and for this reason I added the
> explicit setDrawBuffers call. The explicit call also lessens the risk
> for code breakage of current uses of the attachment map.
The BufferComponent's in the AttachmentMap area meant to be reasonable
unambiguous, COLOR_BUFFER1 upwards all require MRT to be implemented,
they can't be implement in any other way, so I don't think
implementing the backend to use MRT automatically would be
inappropriate or break previous code.
enum BufferComponent
{
DEPTH_BUFFER,
STENCIL_BUFFER,
COLOR_BUFFER,
COLOR_BUFFER0 = COLOR_BUFFER,
COLOR_BUFFER1 = COLOR_BUFFER+1,
COLOR_BUFFER2 = COLOR_BUFFER+2,
COLOR_BUFFER3 = COLOR_BUFFER+3,
COLOR_BUFFER4 = COLOR_BUFFER+4,
COLOR_BUFFER5 = COLOR_BUFFER+5,
COLOR_BUFFER6 = COLOR_BUFFER+6,
COLOR_BUFFER7 = COLOR_BUFFER+7
};
> I'm sure you will see that there is no magic to my current
> implementation. The difficult part is to figure out when to enable it.
Can we not just do it when COLOR_BUFFER1 upwards are enabled?
Robert.
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
