Hi again, Err... I think I missed something. What I plan to do is: - Check out osgWidget-dev branch - Use osgAnimation from the branch in my project (under Win32) - Send back *potential* modifications as an archive of modified sources on the "osg-submissions" list. These sources would always be made from the HEAD revision, since I only have to update my working copy.
Is that okay for both of you? Sincerely, -- Sukender Le Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:31:51 +0100, Cedric Pinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: > Hi Sukender, > The only risk you add if you dont use the osgWidget branch or my > mercurial repository is to patch something outdated. if you are > interested by those functionnalities i suggest to use this branch. > osgAnimation is very young and will move quickly, so i suppose there is > a lot of chance you patch something outdated if you dont use our branch. > > Cheers, > Cedric > > Sukender wrote: >>> Just keep in mind that while I update the osgWidget branch pretty >>> frequently, I only sync with trunk every 2 weeks or so. With Cedric >>> committing there now too, you're bound to see updates every day... >>> >> >> I understand that getting a modified source of the HEAD revision is better >> than an older one, but just for confirmation: is there any problem for you >> if I send modified sources from, say, "HEAD-1" or "HEAD-2"? >> Anyway, I'll update as much as possible. _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
