Hi Brian, You shouldn't need to apply Alberto's patch, my changed avoided the need for Alberto's patch. svn/trunk should compile fine.
I'm kinda surprised by the observed relationship with osglauncher behaviour. Did osglauncher work OK prior to these changes? Robert. On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Brian Keener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brian Keener wrote: >> I did notice and >> seems I have noticed this before - from osgLauncher some of the processes >> (burning cessna, particles) end up hidden behind the osgLauncher screen. >> Some work fine but a few of these end up hidden and you think you have >> problem until you find them and sometimes they are hard to get to come to the >> front. Might be just Cygwin but thought I would mention it in case others >> have noticed. > > Not sure what is going on with the above but when I first compiled right after > applying Alberto's patch I was able to use osgLauncher and it would run > several > of the examples and as documented above several ended up hidden and were > difficult to get to come to the top so they could be closed. Then when I > compiled with Roberts revised patch then it seemed that none of the examples > were running from osgLauncher but in fact they were running but they are > either > not coming to the front or they are not the window is not being built. When I > finally break out of them - like osggeometry I can see the calculation on the > window but I never saw the actual osggeometry screen. This is only from > osglauncher - osggeometry by itself from the command line - works fine. > > I have since compiled (full make uninstall, make clean, delete all obj files, > ccmake and then make) again with Alberto's patch and with Roberts patch and > still cannot get back to the first run of many of the osglauncher run apps > working (visible). > > I have not had a chance to try to debug but I did compile a debug version and > we > need a patch there because osglauncher doesn't recognize the debug version of > the files so I can the message osganimate could not be found instead of > osganimated could not be found. > > At any rate - any thoughts on the above - why this change in results might be > happening. > > thanks > > bk > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org > _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
