Hi all, We discussed something similar before, but do you think it could be wise to also put "secondary" maintainers? My idea is to write something roughly like: "Visual C++ 2005 SP1 (vc80sp1) 32-bit: Primary maintainer(s): Jean-Sébastien Guay Secondary maintainer(s) (if primary is/are too busy/absent/etc): me"
Agreed? Or is it useless? Sukender PVLE - Lightweight cross-platform game engine - http://pvle.sourceforge.net/ Le Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:59:49 +0100, Jean-Sébastien Guay <[email protected]> a écrit: > Hi Robert, > >> Yep sounds reasonable, go add them :-) > > Done :-) > >> I started with the linux distros as these tend to be external parties >> to the OSG community, packages under Windows/OSX tend to be driven by >> core members of the community whom we can easily contact via >> osg-users. It's the external parties that are currently the part that >> we need to join up. > > I understand the initial motivation, but I think it's a good place to > group that info. Whatever can be done by this community can be tracked > more or less in the same way. > > Note that I changed the wording of the top paragrpah a bit. > > So, others are welcome to pitch in and put their names for any given > toolchain/architecture that isn't already taken! Go go go! :-) > > Thanks, > > J-S _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
