Hi Sergey, Yes, this is intentional. It came to my attention that the FFTW library is covered by a GPL license and therefore the library must also share the status.
However, I am working on replacing the FFTW library with an LGPL alternative so that I can change it back to LGPL, but until then I will have to keep the GPL license. I'll update when I've swapped the library. Apologies. Kim. -----Original Message----- From: osg-users-boun...@lists.openscenegraph.org on behalf of Sergey Kurdakov Sent: Fri 08/05/2009 12:33 To: OpenSceneGraph Users Subject: [osg-users] osgOcean release Hi Kim, what I noticed that osgOcean ( on main page at google code and as well in License.txt in svn ) is licensed under GPL not LGPL or OSGGPL, is this intended or it is just a mistyping ? Regards Sergey _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
<<winmail.dat>>
***************************************************************************************** To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to http://www.hull.ac.uk/legal/email_disclaimer.html *****************************************************************************************
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
