Hi Kim, On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Kim C Bale <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sergey, > > Yes, this is intentional. It came to my attention that the FFTW library is > covered by a GPL license and therefore the library must also share the status. > > However, I am working on replacing the FFTW library with an LGPL alternative > so that I can change it back to LGPL, but until then I will have to keep the > GPL license.
I don't think this is required. Your own source code is yours to license how you like, it's the final composite work that would have to licensed as the GPL. For instances your headers and source could be LGPL, but when you link your application against the GPL library then resulting osgOcean library would need to be under the GPL. If FFTW was replaced by another library that was LGPL then the resulting library would be LGPL, if this library was binary binary compatible then you could actually swap the two implementations without changing anything in your code, and with it the license rules would change with it. If you make your own source code GPL, even temporarily then this isn't possible. Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
