Doug McCorkle schrieb: > Hello Robert, > > On Nov 9, 2009, at 3:22 AM, Robert Osfield wrote: > >> Hi Paul, >> >> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Paul Martz <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi Robert -- There are large projects out there based on SceneView and >>> getting along just fine without osgViewer. Removing SceneView would, at >>> best, require them to migrate SceneView out of OSG and into their >>> own app >>> (where it would continue to work, barring future incompatible >>> changes in >>> OSG). And at worst, cost them an expensive port and re-verification >>> of their >>> product. >>> >>> I support marking SceneView as deprecated and replaced by Renderer, but >>> think it would be wise to avoid changes to OSG that render SceneView >>> inoperable. >> >> This has been my plan. To steadily move more functionality into >> osgViewer::Renderer and make SceneView redundant w.r.t modern OSG >> usage. SceneView needn't change too much, as >> CullVisitor/RenderStage/RenderBin etc. will still be in osgUtil. >> >> Once SceneView is redundant we'd need to make decision of when to move >> it out of the core OSG into the deprecated section of the subversion >> repository along with items like the old OpenFlight plugin. Prior to >> SceneView being moved out we'll need a period where we encourage OSG >> users still relying on SceneView to migrate to using osgViewer::Viewer >> in conjunction with osgViewer::GraphicsWindowEmbedded, as it offers >> the same easy ability to embed but offers a whole heap more >> flexibility and functionality. > > Do you have an example of how to use this class with an existing > windowing toolkit? There was an FAQ on this subject related to > SceneView that does not seem to be present anymore. If you have an > example related to osgViewer that would be great. osgViewerGlut does this, for instance.
Regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
