Hi Neil,

That did help and answered what the problem was.

[quote]Did you recompile the examples after rebuilding OSG itself?[/code]

No I did not.
Now I know what the problem is I can deal with it.

Great, good to know we finally found it.

From my first post:

Is this my error or has the format changed?

The format has changed to include osg71-.

Again, no the format did not change between 2.9.9 and the current SVN trunk. The osgXX- prefix has been there since at least 2.6. However this applies only to VC++ builds. When compiling for other compilers like GCC (which MinGW uses) it is not needed, so if your previous prebuilt packages were built with MinGW that's why you didn't have the prefixes.

You did not initially give us enough information to help you. You just said "did the format change?". Well, if both your builds had been made with the same compiler, what we said would have been correct, the format did not change. However, you didn't state that your prebuilts were built with MinGW, and now you were building with VC++. So from your point of view, the format had changed.

J-S
--
______________________________________________________
Jean-Sebastien Guay    jean-sebastien.g...@cm-labs.com
                               http://www.cm-labs.com/
                        http://whitestar02.webhop.org/
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org

Reply via email to