Hi David, Chris et. al, On 14 April 2015 at 22:47, Chris Hanson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think OSG is a bad fit for Vulkan. OSG has so much code to support FFP > dataflows that Vulkan doesn't have. > > I personally think a Vulkan scenegraph could be made from the components > of OSG (OSG 4.x?) but bringing along all of OSG's legacy code into a Vulkan > space would be counterproductive. > This is not far from my own viewpoint. I do have a rough plan in mind that is still evolving. I'll open my own thoughts for discussion once OSG-3.4 is out the door. Right now getting a OSG-3.4 is my focus. Robert.
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
