Op zo 21 jul. 2019 om 10:13 schreef Martin Trautmann <[email protected]>: > On 19-07-18 14:40, Harry van der Wolf wrote: > > > > > > Op do 18 jul. 2019 om 10:26 schreef Martin Trautmann <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > But to imply that you have to think and work in a certain way, for no > other reason than a design flaw (?) that broke the other way - I do not > agree here. > > Personally, I have my own problems with osmand, not keeping its > destination. > > Whenever I enter a destination, but do not start immediately, the > destination is gone and not even visible within the history - which > would be the least where it should be kept. > > OK, you have valid arguments. So we all have our own ways to do "something" in OsmAnd. So many users, so many tastes.
OsmAnd has the most functionality I know of any Nav app. That might mean that some design decisions are considered as design flaws to others. (Personally I still think that the "double-layer" rendering implemented after version 1.3 (yes, really that old) is a design flaw as since then screen rendering is much slower.) If users consider some "way of working" as a design flaw or bug, please file an issue in the tracker: https://github.com/osmandapp/Osmand/issues If enough users think that way and the developers are convinced by "your" explanation how it should work, it might be implemented/changed. This mailing list is really an "end users helping each other" list. The devs hardly look at it. For them the issue tracker is their communication channel. So please file a ticket (first search if it already has been filed), and maybe your wishes will be implemented. Harry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/CAGARPpsHkYPSMLWDp2xscc%2B9wZgQJyLg6f03pKmqaes9BqOg7w%40mail.gmail.com.
