Hi, Am Freitag, 6. März 2020 13:05:12 UTC+1 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: > > > Sorry. My stupid mistake. I said roads, but I meant routing (of course). > When I said that the data is not so big, I meant the routing data. > > I don't see like that. Routing data may include at least every way which is marked with keyword "highway". These are not only streets for cars, but includes footpaths and all other variations of "highways". In the early times of OSM there was only a street for cars. Pedestrian ways were mostly "assumed" to exist as well. Then they were eventually excluded, then seperate pedestrian paths were implemented, also separate cycle ways may have been created. And see what happened to routing in forests, routing of trekking paths and so on. While calculating the route even for cars, everything on its way has to be considered to see if it fits or not. I find this a quite enormous amount of data, growing massively.
Best regards, Alexander. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/d45ede2c-ccee-4ac1-8f4f-749fee977004%40googlegroups.com.
