Op di 24 mrt. 2020 om 07:32 schreef Lodro Gyamtso <[email protected]>:

> after the answer of user "Poutnik", we have another proof that the OSMAnd
> and BRoute use slow (bad) technology.
>
> Software like Here WeGO, Sygic, Tomtom Go, iGO, navigon, navitel, route
> 66, copilot, mireo, etc , are far away from this low level apps (OSMAnd and
> BRout). And all of this top companies has offline navigation apps. So, the
> user "Episteme PROMENEUR" has right into his first post.
>
> My opinion is - don't use osmand, locus, orux, brouter, for city
> navigation. They are only for mountain use.
>
>
That is not true. Both OsmAnd and BRouter are excellent routers. OsmAnd is
slower on longer distances, but that can be tweaked.
OsmAnd is even the best in cities due to it's penalty system for traffic
lights and  traffic bumps and the like.
If you calculate a route inside a city, the route might be the same, but
OsmAnds ETA is by far the most accurate even though TomTom uses their
"smart routing" where they collected statistical data on "heavy use" roads.
And sometimes OsmAnds route is different, exactly because it uses these
penalties. I personally did many test and especially in cities (!), OsmAnd
is by far the best when calculating the route AND the correct ETA. So
actually in cities I do use OsmAnd.
Please test yourself before posting these "theories".
I know less about BRouter, although I used it for cycling, and that was
excellent. So why "mountain use"?
Here WeGo is currently only a city navigation tool, so useless in my eyes
(unless it is builtin into your car navigation set).

Finally: There is not one single navigation app in the world that offers
the wide portfolio of functionality that OsmAnd does. Not one!

Harry

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OsmAnd" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/CAGARPpt6C_-ePHQ1nLNwh81DuaF-VsbcGrS%2BRf4_LK1AWdQ1MQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to