this post is special for user "Harry van der Wolf" who do you think that you are ? who gave you the right to say to other people -* Please test yourself before posting these "theories"*. Is your ego and arrogance ? That's why i suggest to you "don't say to other people what to do into their personal lives"
i am writing a post having experience of my devices or reading posts from other users. I did exactly what you made, i write my thoughts as you did, without judging other people. I use only what the others say, just to found answers. Using my old smartphone for a route inside the city of 60 Km, the results time is over 1 minute for calculation. With my new smartphone for the same route needs less of 20secs to draw the route. With all the navigation apps i have mentions before, the route results is 1sec (instantaneously) for both of my devices. p.s sorry for my english On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 at 12:53:14 PM UTC+2, Harry van der Wolf wrote: > > > > Op di 24 mrt. 2020 om 07:32 schreef Lodro Gyamtso <[email protected] > <javascript:>>: > >> after the answer of user "Poutnik", we have another proof that the OSMAnd >> and BRoute use slow (bad) technology. >> >> Software like Here WeGO, Sygic, Tomtom Go, iGO, navigon, navitel, route >> 66, copilot, mireo, etc , are far away from this low level apps (OSMAnd and >> BRout). And all of this top companies has offline navigation apps. So, the >> user "Episteme PROMENEUR" has right into his first post. >> >> My opinion is - don't use osmand, locus, orux, brouter, for city >> navigation. They are only for mountain use. >> >> > That is not true. Both OsmAnd and BRouter are excellent routers. OsmAnd is > slower on longer distances, but that can be tweaked. > OsmAnd is even the best in cities due to it's penalty system for traffic > lights and traffic bumps and the like. > If you calculate a route inside a city, the route might be the same, but > OsmAnds ETA is by far the most accurate even though TomTom uses their > "smart routing" where they collected statistical data on "heavy use" roads. > And sometimes OsmAnds route is different, exactly because it uses these > penalties. I personally did many test and especially in cities (!), OsmAnd > is by far the best when calculating the route AND the correct ETA. So > actually in cities I do use OsmAnd. > Please test yourself before posting these "theories". > I know less about BRouter, although I used it for cycling, and that was > excellent. So why "mountain use"? > Here WeGo is currently only a city navigation tool, so useless in my eyes > (unless it is builtin into your car navigation set). > > Finally: There is not one single navigation app in the world that offers > the wide portfolio of functionality that OsmAnd does. Not one! > > Harry > > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/9455b432-a528-44ab-9949-8b31ba934569%40googlegroups.com.
