Op ma 16 mrt. 2020 om 03:43 schreef A Thompson <[email protected]>:
> > These are different. But it remains the case that the only absolute > guarantee that the optimal route will be found is hc=1.0. I think I have > created car and pedestrian profiles that use a customised routing.xml with > hc=1.0 but I have yet to find a route that gives different results to > OsmAnd 3.6.3's current values (1.5 for car, 1.2 for pedestrian). > > (Harry - had you noticed that the standard values are now this high?) > > > Sorry, but that is not correct. The value of 1.5 for car navigation is "outcommented" as it is between HTML/XML "remark coding", being the starting *<!--* and closing *-->*. <routingProfile name="car" baseProfile="car" restrictionsAware="true" minSpeed="20.0" defaultSpeed="45.0" maxSpeed="130.0" leftTurn="5" rightTurn="5" roundaboutTurn="5" onewayAware="true"> *<!--<attribute name="heuristicCoefficient" value="1.5" />-->* That value is still there from before 2011~2012. Before the 2-step calculator, the hc WAS 1.5. Now it is 1.6 for the first step, and 1.0 for the second step (don't ask me how it works). The syntax has also slightly changed. Now it is (from my mycar13.xml): <routingProfile name="mycar13" baseProfile="car" restrictionsAware="true" minSpeed="20.0" defaultSpeed="45.0" maxSpeed="130.0" leftTurn="5" rightTurn="5" roundaboutTurn="5" onewayAware="true" heuristicCoefficient="1.3"> Pedestrian and cycling has always been higher than 1, but as far as I remember cycling was 1.2 up till last year. Now it is 1.4 Harry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/CAGARPptYVeMCF_YQmQZuZthNyym2CwjikG7CxFKK5PJa6%3DUNPg%40mail.gmail.com.
