> I realize this is preference, but as someone who knows how to read maps,
> I very strongly dislike 3D view. I want to see a plan view, with angles
> preserved and scale preserved. I know that it does not match visually
> what I see out the window, but I am able to know relative distances in
> complex intersections, and to know the turn angles.
While I don't really mind the pseudo-3D view itself, the thing that
I find more important is the "north-up" option: with the north
constantly moving around I find that I end up learning the map much more
slowly.
Regarding routing speed: I find Osmand's routing occasionally slow (not
in comparison to other tools, but in the fact that the speed is
annoying), but it's not nearly as a serious a problem as is the power
consumption (when running on battery, my phone will barely last 1h
running osmand in routing mode, so I have to carefully suspend the
routing and restart it for any significant use).
> I don't care if 3D is an option.
Same here.
Stefan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"OsmAnd" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/jwv1rpcy2wp.fsf-monnier%2BInbox%40gnu.org.
