Hi Xavier.
Thanks for your lucid response.  Questions understood, and the reason for 
them.
1) Phone - IS the same as a couple of years ago.
2) Battery - IS the same as a couple of years ago. 
"Aha! There's the problem"; I hear you cry.  And I understand your logic, 
(where you're coming from).  I am an engineer and am cognisant of the 
problems of aging batteries, diminished capacity, reduced current delivery, 
and such.  However, in defence of the battery in this instance, I am 
reasonably confident that it is still giving respectable delivery.  Daily 
drain under normal circumstances is so far not unduly reduced since new.

Clearly you are technically aware so I'll refer back to parts of my 
original post:-
a) "Just normal daily use receiving mail, texts, making the odd phone call, 
*running 
Osmand as a map*, the consumption is OK".  To which I could add listening 
to radio for several hours per evening, and other usage.
b) " Battery lasts all day, and more."   This phone model does have an 
unusually high capacity battery.  It can still easily do 24 hrs between 
charges, but is generally charged overnight.
I could send a screenprint of the battery status at the end of a typical 
day (with no Osmand usage) for comparison.
I could send another including Osmand usage (ie tracking location whilst 
moving, but WITHOUT NAVIGATION INSTRUCTIONS)
Purpose of the above - To confirm long running time (slow battery drain) in 
the two foregoing conditions.  I believe I have already satisfied myself of 
this but do not have any recorded evidence to hand.  Hence my question 
"Power consumption - Has it crept up?"  Am I really the first user to 
comment?
Thanks in advance.
PW

On Friday, June 4, 2021 at 6:19:44 PM UTC+1 Xavier wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 04:07:20AM -0700, 'P Wat' via OsmAnd wrote:
> >[image: OsmAndPowerDrainScreenshot_20210530-184241.png]Has OsmAnd power
> >consumption been creeping up?
> >I first noticed the problem several months ago, but have only recently had
> >the opportunity to analyse it.
> >Just normal daily use receiving mail, texts, making the odd phone call,
> >running Osmand as a map, the consumption is OK. Battery lasts all day, and
> >more.
> >Running OsmAnd for navigation (route instructions, etc) it eats my battery
> >in an unacceptable time, eg 45 minutes.
> >A coupe of years ago I was able to navigate for 8 or 10 hours without
> >problems
> >See pic attached.
> >Technical info:-
> >Phone Motorola Moto X Force
> >Android 7.0
> >Osmand+ 3.9.10
> >Osmand Nautical 1.0
> >Osmand contour lines 1.0
>
> First question: Is the phone today the same phone from "a couple of 
> years ago"?
>
> Second question: If it is the same phone, is it *also* the same battery 
> from "a couple of years ago"?
>
> These are important facts to know, because if it is a different phone 
> today than "a couple of years ago" you can't reliably compare "runtime 
> a couple years ago" to "runtime today".
>
> Also, if it is the same battery (which would also mean same phone) then
> the batterie's capacity will have dropped in the interveaning years, so
> the battery will be less able to stand up to heavy current usage now as
> compared to a couple years ago.
>
> Also, I have seen it mentioned before in various places on the internet
> that the GPS receivers in most phones are fairly power hungry, and if
> the battery is not as strong today as it was a couple years ago (I am
> assuming same battery here) then it might very well be able to support
> the low current drain of "normal daily use" but no longer have the
> capacity to handle the high current drain of also running the GPS
> receiver. Android normally keeps the GPS receivers powered down (even
> if you don't explicity 'turn off GPS') until some app. requests a
> location fix. But in the case of Osmand, when navigating, it will need
> to be requesting constant location fixes, which will directly equate to
> higher current needs out of the battery (because Android can't keep the
> GPS receiver turned off for as long).
>
> So, if your battery is several years old, then what you see on the
> graph you attached could simply indicate an old, and thereby a
> significantly smaller capacity than when new, battery.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OsmAnd" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/d14da4e6-9483-43b8-8db5-2f8b27c1e06an%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to