It is reassuring to hear that I am not alone in noting:- a) OsmAnd power consumption has crept up. b) Osmand uses significantly more power when NAVIGATING (ie calculating a route and delivering turn instructions), than when merely acting as a map and logging track. c) You can still recommend OsmAnd to people but only with a caveat about power consumption.
>Xavier - Due to family reasons and other factors I have had to postpone following-up your suggestions, bit I WILL when time permits - Thank you. >Others - Running OsmAnd for navigation on a car's battery is no problem of course, but most/many of us want it for walking/cycling/sailing where external power, even solar, is not practicable. >Developers - You really do need to take this matter seriously in order to sustain the credibility of the app. I am probably not alone in already considering other options. PW On Friday, August 13, 2021 at 9:55:03 AM UTC+1 anyso...@gmail.com wrote: > Do anyone know if using offline maps instead of constantly locally > calculated vector map reduce the consume of the battery? > > AnyFile > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/b1f2ccc7-8c1e-4429-af78-09aadf12e2c7n%40googlegroups.com.
