> > Hmm I was under the impression OSS was actually filtering those out > > before publishing ? > > As far as I can see, OSS doesn't even look for modem codecs. What I > described above was working implementations (such as ones using ALSA > drivers). > > What I meant to imply was that adding support for MC97 PCM devices to > OSS should not be difficult. >
Ok, but are those daemon port[ed|able] ? It might be easier for users to have tty devices published directly instead... of course it would mean doing the decoding in kernel land, which is probably not such a good idea. Though it's likely not more dangerous than a soft mixer :) François. _______________________________________________ oss-devel mailing list oss-devel@mailman.opensound.com http://mailman.opensound.com/mailman/listinfo/oss-devel
