That's another part of this. If she can bash Obama over the head for using the word "bitter" instead of "angry" and "cling" instead of "turn do", then she can hardly complain about being hammered over a clumsily worded statement (if we give her every benefit of the doubt).
On May 28, 2008, at 3:22 AM, Kevin Callahan wrote: > > On May 27, 2008, at 5:48 AM, David Cake wrote: > >> At 4:51 AM -0600 27/5/08, LuKreme wrote: >>> On 27-May-2008, at 01:49, David Cake wrote: >>>> What she said was poorly thought out, and somewhat crass. >>> >>> But she repeated it several times over the course of months. >> >> And the first few times, no one noticed. Suddenly, it becomes >> the most heinous thing she has ever said. Weird. > > not really > > he statements don't appear to have made the MSM until now > > at least not to the level the MSM and the Clintons leveled against > Obama for *someone else's words* > > words do matter, she says > > while the comments don't resonate with you, > > I think Olbermann, Feinman and others, including the Presidential > historian editor of "The Reagan Diaries", Douglas Brinkley, > articulate quite well the import of her statement > > > K > > > _______________________________________________ > OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] > http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters > List hosted at http://cat5.org/ _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
