On May 29, 2008, at 10:03 AM, LuKreme wrote:

> I'm with Kevin, I will *not* vote for her, and up until quite recently
> I would have, albeit begrudgingly.

Nobody is going to have to vote for her. I'm increasingly convinced  
that some of the anger against her is misplaced.

This is a person who grew up in an abusive household, who has a frail  
grasp of reality, and who may be in the grip of religious mania  
combined with a persecution complex. For christ's sake she actually   
believed  that her husband and his cronies sent her into a situation  
where she would come under sniper fire because he considered her  
expendable.

I don't understand why Eagleton was unacceptable as vice president  
because he had a few shock treatments was unacceptable as vice  
president but Hillary, who famously resorted to new age gurus and  
conversations with dead people as a means of coping with Monica, and  
who clearly still suffers from breaks with reality when things get  
stressful, is seriously considered as a candidate for president.

The more you know about Hillary, the more you realize that she is  
doing the best she can. She is smart and well meaning but laboring  
under some psychiatric handicaps. Cut her some slack.
--
Egotism is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of stupidity.
-Frank William Leahy, football coach (1908-1973)

_______________________________________________
OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
List hosted at http://cat5.org/

Reply via email to