On May 29, 2008, at 10:50 AM, Chris Gehlker wrote:

>
> On May 29, 2008, at 10:03 AM, LuKreme wrote:
>
>> I'm with Kevin, I will *not* vote for her, and up until quite  
>> recently
>> I would have, albeit begrudgingly.
>
> Nobody is going to have to vote for her. I'm increasingly convinced
> that some of the anger against her is misplaced.

I'm not angry with her.  I just despise her as a politician and  
elected official.

>
>
> This is a person who grew up in an abusive household, who has a frail
> grasp of reality, and who may be in the grip of religious mania
> combined with a persecution complex. For christ's sake she actually
> believed  that her husband and his cronies sent her into a situation
> where she would come under sniper fire because he considered her
> expendable.

yeah, amazing

>
>
> I don't understand why Eagleton was unacceptable as vice president
> because he had a few shock treatments was unacceptable as vice
> president but Hillary, who famously resorted to new age gurus and
> conversations with dead people as a means of coping with Monica, and
> who clearly still suffers from breaks with reality when things get
> stressful, is seriously considered as a candidate for president.

god point


>
>
> The more you know about Hillary, the more you realize that she is
> doing the best she can. She is smart and well meaning

i don't believe she is well-meaning

> but laboring
> under some psychiatric handicaps. Cut her some slack.

nope.

K


_______________________________________________
OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
List hosted at http://cat5.org/

Reply via email to