On Sep 1, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Chris Gehlker wrote: > > On Sep 1, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Lawrence Sica wrote: > >>> I agree. This is like lying about getting a blow job. It's no big >>> deal. >>> >> >> Well when you try and make yourself out to be a saint because you >> carried a downs baby to full term knowing what you had then it is an >> issue. It's one thing to cover up your daughter being pregnant. >> It's >> another to try and use that cover up, or the fruits of it, to further >> your political career in such a public way. That is the part I don't >> like. > > I did a Google search and there was no hint in the Alaska papers of > the time that the Palins knew the baby had Down's syndrome before it > was born. I know there are tests that one can have but there is no > evidence that they had the tests. AFAICT this whole thing about 'she > knowingly carried a Down's syndrome baby to term' was just made up by > the fundie christians. According to the paper she talked about how her > family was dealing with the issue only after the birth. > -
I've seen recent reports mentioning it. Maybe not at that time but they are trying to use it now. --Larry _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
