Budget deficit = 407b this year.
3 trillion dollar war

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 9, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Charles Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> On Sep 8, 2008, at 10:16 PM, David Cake wrote:
>
>> At 1:27 PM -0400 8/9/08, Charles Bennett wrote:
>>> "Democrat Barack Obama says he would delay rescinding President
>>> Bush's
>>> tax cuts on wealthy Americans if he becomes the next president and
>>> the
>>> economy is in a recession, suggesting such an increase would further
>>> hurt the economy."
>>>
>>> SO.. Increasing taxes in the wealthy DOES hurt the economy but well
>>> do
>>> it anyway.   Just later...
>>
>>    Really, you actually think that a given economic decision is
>> absolutely good or bad, regardless of prevailing economic conditions?
>
> It's revealing of his thought process.  He knows that increasing taxes
> on the wealthy will hurt the economy but somehow wants to have his
> cake and eat it too.   What I hear is this.
>
> "I still want to increase your taxes but I have to get elected  
> first.."
>
>
>
>>
>> You seem to be arguing that timing of economic decisions is utterly
>> irrelevant.
>
> I guess it is if you think the well off are cows to be milked when the
> time is right or allowed to fatten up when it's not.
>
> Take a stand either way but don't hide your real intentions behind
> weasel words.
>
> Like I said, the wealthy weren't voting for him anyway, so why even
> bother saying this?   Does he think the poor are going to go "Oh good,
> he is going to delay the tax increase on the wealthy so I'll vote for
> him?
>
> Who the heck is his audience for this comment?
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> "Barack Obama has said he considered joining the United States
>>> military when he left school but decided not to because the Vietnam
>>> war was over and "we weren't engaged in an active military conflict
>>> at
>>> that point"."
>>>
>>> *Right.. No point in serving if you can't kill some commies.*
>>> Otherwise I'm sure he'd been  a gung ho badass muther..
>>>
>>> That comment makes as much sense as "I tried pot by I didn't inhale"
>>> To call that comment bullshit would insult bovine kind everywhere..
>>
>>    So, when making a career, you don't remotely consider what
>> you'd actually be doing?
>>
>>    Cheap shots, my friend, cheap shots.
>
> It's not a cheap shot.  He's lying and any person that has actually
> served knows it at first glance.
>
> You can't possible believe that Obama actually thought of going into
> the military but decided against it because there were no wars?   That
> just does not pass the smell test.
>
> Politically it is simply pointless to even bother pretending to be
> anything other that what he his because people can smell pandering
> from a distance.
>
> I'm not saying there is something wrong with following the ivy league
> lawyer/ politician path but just don't pretend to be something you are
> not and expect people who have actually served their country to
> believe you.
>
> Clue for Obama.., There is honor in serving and PROTECTING your
> country when there are no wars going on.   In fact the whole point of
> the military is to be strong in peacetime so potential enemies avoid
> starting wars.  If he doesn't get that he isn't qualified to run the
> military because that type of thinking leads to cuts during peacetime
> that get soldiers killed during war.
>
> To me it just comes off as desperate and politically stupid.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Vote for me, I'm  McCain Lite..
>>
>>    Even if I swallowed this idiot line, I'd much rather have the
>> Lite version than the full strength.
>>
>
>
> Fair enough.   I suspect many feel the same way but some of the
> undecided just might choose the real thing and it won't take a lot to
> swing the race the other way.
>
> My meta point on all of this is that he looks more and more like a
> plain old run of the mill politician, not some agent of actual change
> and the more he comes 'down to earth' the more McCain is going to gain
> ground on him.
>
> =c=
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
> http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
> List hosted at http://cat5.org/
_______________________________________________
OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
List hosted at http://cat5.org/

Reply via email to