Lisa, do you see the two as exclusive of each other?  How is strengthening
someone's arm different than retraining their arm (which I don't understand
how you can retrain an arm)for 'functional' use.  If the problem is a
strength issue what's the differences.

Thanks,

Ron

P.S. Again, I am not trying to be inflammatory, just trying to sincerely
understand.

~~~~~
On 7/11/2002, Lisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

LC> Not at all.  I would hope that PT would also work on strengthening the UE so
LC> I could spend my time retraining the affected UE for functional use.

LC> Lisa Castilla, MS, OTR
LC> Director of Occupational Therapy
LC> West Virginia Rehabilitation Center
LC> P. O.  Box 1004, Institute, WV  25112
LC> (304)-766-4863/1-800-642-8207
LC> FAX 766-4849



>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ron Carson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:21 PM
>> To:   Lisa Castilla
>> Subject:      Re[6]: A message from Advance for PT
>> 
>> Hello Linda:
>> 
>> If I am reading correctly, it's an Upper Extremity = OT and Lower
>> Extremity
>> = PT type of issue. In other words, PT addresses the lower extremity
>> impairment so it would be double treatment for OT to address the
>> impairment.
>> But if it were an UE impairment, PT would not address it.  Is this
>> correct?
>> 
>> If so, why?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Ron
>> 
>> ~~~~~
>> On 7/11/2002, Lisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> 
>> LC> Hi Ron.
>> 
>> LC>         In this setting, most likely not.  Typically, students here
>> receive
>> LC> at least 2 hours of PT a day.  The PT most likely has addressed the
>> LC> weakness, it is not appropriate for me to do the same.  The weakness
>> would
>> LC> be inadvertently be addressed through treatment activity and
>> placement, but
>> LC> would not be my primary focus.
>> 
>> LC> Lisa Castilla, MS, OTR
>> LC> Director of Occupational Therapy
>> LC> West Virginia Rehabilitation Center
>> LC> P. O.  Box 1004, Institute, WV  25112
>> LC> (304)-766-4863/1-800-642-8207
>> LC> FAX 766-4849
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Ron Carson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> >> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:02 PM
>> >> To:   Lisa Castilla
>> >> Subject:      Re[4]: A message from Advance for PT
>> >> 
>> >> Hello Lisa:
>> >> 
>> >> Can I ask you why?  Why wouldn't you address the weakness which is
>> >> contributing to the occupational deficit?  What if a client had upper
>> >> extremity weakness keeping them from cooking?  Would you address the UE
>> >> weakness?
>> >> 
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> 
>> >> Ron
>> >> 
>> >> P.S. I am not trying to be difficult or inflammatory. I am just trying
>> to
>> >> understand why most OT's only treat upper extremity physiological
>> issues
>> >> and
>> >> not lower extremity issues.
>> >> 
>> >> Thanks!
>> >> 
>> >> ~~~~~
>> >> On 7/11/2002, Lisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> >> 
>> >> LC> As a member of a collaborative team, I would be more apt to
>> >> concentrate on
>> >> LC> the transfer, compensatory techniques and training than actual
>> lower
>> >> LC> extremity strengthening.
>> >> 
>> >> LC> Lisa Castilla, MS, OTR
>> >> LC> Director of Occupational Therapy
>> >> LC> West Virginia Rehabilitation Center
>> >> LC> P. O.  Box 1004, Institute, WV  25112
>> >> LC> (304)-766-4863/1-800-642-8207
>> >> LC> FAX 766-4849
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> From: David Lehman [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> >> >> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 8:57 AM
>> >> >> To:   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>> >> >> Subject:      RE: Re[2]: A message from Advance for PT
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Beautifully said Ron....and I agree with you....see, I am NOT one of
>> >> those
>> >> >> PTs....hmmmm, 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > David A. Lehman, Ph.D., P.T.   ~ ~_/) ~
>> >> >> > Assistant Professor
>> >> >> > University of St. Augustine 
>> >> >> > 1 University Blvd.
>> >> >> > St. Augustine, FL 32086-5783
>> >> >> > (904) 826-0084 ext. 227
>> >> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> From: Ron Carson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> >> >> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 8:46 AM
>> >> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> Subject: Re[2]: A message from Advance for PT
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Hey Jody:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> No flame!!!
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Do you treat lower extremity issues?
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> I asked this because in my class discussion that I previously
>> >> mentioned, I
>> >> >> used the scenario that a client can't do toilet transfers because of
>> >> lower
>> >> >> extremity weakness.  In this situation, what's the difference
>> between
>> >> OT
>> >> >> and
>> >> >> PT roles.  In this case, wouldn't OT want to work on lower extremity
>> >> >> weakness and have the client doing quad strengthening exercises or
>> >> >> whatever
>> >> >> muscles were weak.  Students seem almost shaken by the fact that OT
>> >> would
>> >> >> have clients doing lower extremity strengthening.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> I agree 100% about the turf issue being a natural part of
>> professional
>> >> >> life.
>> >> >> In fact, I constantly preach to students that OT and PT having
>> issues
>> >> is
>> >> >> no
>> >> >> different than PT and Chiropractic having issues.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Unfortunately, to some extent, it's a dog eat dog world and only the
>> >> >> strong
>> >> >> thrive.  I am coming to learn more and more than when then 'rubber
>> hits
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> road' the profession of PT (not necessarily individual therapists)
>> is
>> >> not
>> >> >> an
>> >> >> ally. As a profession, PT will stand by our profession only when it
>> >> >> doesn't
>> >> >> threaten their profession.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Again, it's a competitive market and healthcare is part of that
>> market.
>> >> >> If
>> >> >> one accepts this belief, then an important question to ask is what
>> can
>> >> be
>> >> >> done about the situation?  In other words, what can be done to
>> ensure
>> >> that
>> >> >> occupational therapy rises to the top rather than sinks to the
>> bottom.
>> >> I
>> >> >> think that even staying the same (i.e. status quo) in the market
>> place
>> >> is
>> >> >> not good.  As a professional organization we need to figure out how
>> to
>> >> >> move
>> >> >> ourselves forward and to establish and maintain dominance in some
>> area
>> >> of
>> >> >> healthcare.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> It will come as no surprise to anyone on this list that I firmly
>> >> believe
>> >> >> that occupation is our ticket to both the present and the future.
>> Many
>> >> >> other
>> >> >> professions including PT are buying into the concept that occupation
>> >> (or
>> >> >> what they call function (which is not the same as occupation)) is
>> the
>> >> way
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> go.  It never ceases to amaze me that as a profession we are poised
>> on
>> >> the
>> >> >> brink of a profitable and unique niche in healthcare but seem so
>> >> reluctant
>> >> >> to embrace it.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Well, that's more information than most people want so let me end.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Ron
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> ~~~~~
>> >> >> On 7/11/2002, SadieMoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Sac> Ron - pretty interesting seeing that point of view.  I know you
>> >> find
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> lot to 
>> >> >> Sac>  agree with in the first PT's  post, but I think turf battles
>> are
>> >> a
>> >> >> natural 
>> >> >> Sac> part of life, and if it wasn't this turf battle, there would be
>> >> >> others
>> >> >> in 
>> >> >> Sac> their facility.  Now, go ahead and flame me, but I do treat UEs
>> as
>> >> >> well
>> >> >> as 
>> >> >> Sac> enabling occupation.  -- Jody
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> *********��***********
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> ** List messages are archived at:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> *********��***********
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> *********��***********
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> ** List messages are archived at:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> *********��***********
>> >> 
>> >> LC> *********��***********
>> >> 
>> >> LC> Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> 
>> >> LC> In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist
>> >> 
>> >> LC> ** List messages are archived at:
>> >> 
>> >> LC> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>> >> 
>> >> LC> *********��***********
>> >> 
>> >> *********��***********
>> >> 
>> >> Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> 
>> >> In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist
>> >> 
>> >> ** List messages are archived at:
>> >> 
>> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>> >> 
>> >> *********��***********
>> 
>> LC> *********��***********
>> 
>> LC> Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> LC> In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist
>> 
>> LC> ** List messages are archived at:
>> 
>> LC> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>> 
>> LC> *********��***********
>> 
>> *********��***********
>> 
>> Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist
>> 
>> ** List messages are archived at:
>> 
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>> 
>> *********��***********

LC> *********��***********

LC> Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

LC> In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist

LC> ** List messages are archived at:

LC> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

LC> *********��***********

*********��***********

Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist

** List messages are archived at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

*********��***********

Reply via email to