Hello Carrie: (What follows is a very long rant about a lot of stuff)

When  ever  I  raise  the  specter  of  competition  between OT and PT,
invariably  someone  raises  the  question  of  "can't  we all just get
along".  This  leads  me  to  the  following.  There is no single right
answer,  there  are  only different perspectives. And depending on your
perspective,  there  could  be  a better answer. For example, most will
agree that it's in the client's best interest if OT and PT collaborate.
So  from  the perspective of the client, collaboration is a good thing.
But  from  a  profession's stand point, collaboration may not be a good
thing.  You  see,  the  markets  in  which we operate are driven by the
all-mighty  dollar. Insurance companys' reimbursement is what fuels the
fires of healthcare. It must be accepted that OT/PT operate in a system
with  limited  resources. In other words, insurance companies only have
so much money they are willing to pay out.

Given these three principles:

1.   OT/PT   depend   on  reimbursement  both  for  salaries  and  for
professional continuance

2. There is limited resources for reimbursement

3.  Companies  will  first pay for what they perceive as being the best
service for their dollars.

I don't see how anyone can't tell that it is a dog eat dog world. Every
dollar  going  to  PT  treatment  that should be going to OT treatment,
costs jobs, research, and professional identity. Of course, the same is
true for PT and chiropractic. Every time a chiro. does a treatment that
PT  should  be doing, that's costing your profession money. The problem
gets even more complicated because, I think most OT's and those entities
utilizing OT services don't really understand OT's unique contribution.
>From  an  insurance perspective, what is it that OT is 'best' at? Is it
UE  function?  Is it function in general? Is it mental health? What can
OT do that NO OTHER profession can do as well?

Of  course,  the  answer  is occupation. As a profession, we can change
client's  ability  to  engage in meaningful occupation in a way that no
other single profession can even come close to touching - not PT, SLP,
psychology,   counseling,   recreation   therapists.   None   of  these
professions  are  trained like OT and none of them can address the many
types of issues which can keep clients from doing occupation.

Our  speciality  is  occupation  which  requires  that  we  have  great
knowledge  about  the  many,  many different aspects that make up human
functioning.  Speaking  of  function,  students  know  that  I refer to
function  as  the  "F" word (there's also the "N" word - non-compliance
and  the  "A"  word  -  activity)  and that I encourage them to NOT use
function. I once thought I was going to be fired for telling a group of
PT  students  that  OT's don't do function, we do occupation. Of course
occupation  is  function  but  it's  function  taken to the Nth degree.
Occupation  is  physical,  emotional, environmental, mental, social and
cognitive  function  all  rolled  up  into one nice neat package called
occupation.

I  don't  know what propelled this graph, but there it is! And to quote
myself, "that's it in a nut thell" Former students will understand!

Ron

~~~~~
On 7/14/02, CndyGirl50 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

Cac> Isn't that part of the problem now, PT and OT are fighting for the top dog 
Cac> position therefore instead of working together as Lisa appropriately does we 
Cac> are doing what we can to be on top. I think Lisa's approach is well stated, 
Cac> but don't forget that PT's do not only strengthen but deal with the aspects 
Cac> of function, strategy and impairments. There is more to each profession then 
Cac> we each give to one another. OT is not the UE and hand and PT is not just 
Cac> ther ex of LE. We need to broden the horizons.

Cac> CR
Cac> Be yourself. No one can ever tell you you're doing it wrong.
Cac> -James Leo Herlihy

Cac> *********��***********

Cac> Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Cac> In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist

Cac> ** List messages are archived at:

Cac> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Cac> *********��***********

*********��***********

Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist

** List messages are archived at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

*********��***********

Reply via email to