Chris,  I  thin  that  if  the  OT  practitioner  is JUST starting to be
efficient, then don't you think it's a little earlier to be branding our
profession.  Should  we  get the internal workings a little more "honed"
before going "public", so to speak?

To me, it' like putting the cart before the horse. It just won't work!!

----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009
To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subj: [OTlist] AOTA's "BRAN" Bus

cac> That is the key to the President's statement.  We must "start".  If 
cac> that does not occur we can forget it.  Not sure what they have planned 
cac> for this aspect.  It would be a good question to ask her on her blog.

cac> -----Original Message-----
cac> From: Ron Carson <[email protected]>
cac> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
cac> Sent: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 7:33 am
cac> Subject: Re: [OTlist] AOTA's "BRAN" Bus

cac> In  my  opinion,  the  AOTA's  president's  own quote clearly shows that
cac> branding will not work for OT. She says:

cac>         Branding   actually   starts   with   the  occupational  therapy
cac>         practitioner   in  that  all  practitioners  must  ensure  their
cac>         services    are   efficient,   effective,   result   in   client
cac>         satisfaction, and have value in terms of the cost-benefit.

cac> Right  off  the  bat,  we  KNOW  that  ALL  practitioners do NOT provide
cac> effective  occupational  therapy  resulting in patient satisfaction. The
cac> "coners" and "peggers" ensure this doesn't happen!

cac> In  my honest opinion of OT, our single biggest problem is INTERNAL, not
cac> external.  As  a  profession, we do NOT do what we say. And NOTHING will
cac> kill  a  product  or  profession  more  quickly and efficiently than not
cac> delivering  what  is  promised  and/or  promoted!  The more the branding
cac> process  proceeds  the  more  we are shooting ourselves in the foot. The
cac> more we promote "living life to it fullest" while delivering "crappy PT"
cac> the  more  disenchanted our patients and referral sources become and the
cac> practice of phsy-dys OT will become even more disenfranchised!

cac> Ron

cac> ~~~
cac> Ron Carson MHS, OT
cac> www.OTnow.com



cac> ----- Original Message -----
cac> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
cac> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009
cac> To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
cac> Subj: [OTlist] AOTA's "BRAN" Bus

cac>> Here is a quote from the AOTA president that supports my statements

cac>> "As a profession, we seem to understand marketing more than we
cac>> understand a branding process. Branding is about building the 
cac> emotional
cac>> reaction to a product or service over time. Branding actually 
cac> starts
cac>> with the occupational therapy practitioner in that all 
cac> practitioners
cac>> must ensure their services are efficient, effective, result in 
cac> client
cac>> satisfaction, and have value in terms of the cost-benefit. 
cac> Branding
cac>> starts with ensuring a basic level of competence, as well as 
cac> making
cac>> sure that every practitioner can deliver the message of what we 
cac> do. We
cac>> all know that this is difficult given all the different types of
cac>> services we provide and the client problems that we solve.

cac>> Therefore, branding is not about a single tag line, poster, etc. 
cac> It is
cac>> really about capturing the essence of our impact. Marketing we 
cac> have
cac>> done before with the posters about skills for the job of living. 
cac> It
cac>> described occupational therapy as a discipline where practitioners
cac>> worked with people with a disabling condition to do things like 
cac> brush
cac>> their hair, etc. This was a great one-time marketing campaign, it 
cac> was
cac>> not a branding process. Granted occupational therapy is about 
cac> getting
cac>> people back to doing; but, when we did the marketing research some 
cac> 8
cac>> years later with our consumers and potential consumers, the good 
cac> news
cac>> was that we did not have a bad image. The bad news was that we did 
cac> not
cac>> have an image. Perhaps likening living to a job did not 
cac> emotionally
cac>> resonate with our consumers."-Moyers





cac> --
cac> Options?
cac> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

cac> Archive?
cac> www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]



cac> --
cac> Options?
cac> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

cac> Archive?
cac> www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to