On 06.12.2016 12:17, Stefano Miccoli wrote:
> maybe we should simply patch
>
> *--- a/module/owlib/src/c/ow_1820.c*
> *+++ b/module/owlib/src/c/ow_1820.c*
> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@static ZERO_OR_ERROR FS_10temp(struct
> one_wire_query *owq)
>
>
>
> static ZERO_OR_ERROR FS_10latesttemp(struct one_wire_query *owq)
> {
> - return GB_to_Z_OR_E(OW_10latesttemp(&OWQ_F(owq), 1, PN(owq)));
> + return GB_to_Z_OR_E(OW_10latesttemp(&OWQ_F(owq), allow_85C,
> PN(owq)));
> }
Yes please. I'm indifferent about dropping the "normal" retry code, but
here the 85° error makes no sense because it can't be fixed with
"retrying" – not at the server level, anyway.
--
-- Matthias Urlichs
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
