Am 06.12.2016 um 12:17 schrieb Stefano Miccoli:
> maybe we should simply patch
>
> --- a/module/owlib/src/c/ow_1820.c
> +++ b/module/owlib/src/c/ow_1820.c
> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ static ZERO_OR_ERROR FS_10temp(struct one_wire_query *owq)
>
> static ZERO_OR_ERROR FS_10latesttemp(struct one_wire_query *owq)
> {
> - return GB_to_Z_OR_E(OW_10latesttemp(&OWQ_F(owq), 1, PN(owq)));
> + return GB_to_Z_OR_E(OW_10latesttemp(&OWQ_F(owq), allow_85C, PN(owq)));
> }
>
> static ZERO_OR_ERROR FS_10temp_link(struct one_wire_query *owq)
> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static ZERO_OR_ERROR FS_22temp(struct one_wire_query *owq)
>
> static ZERO_OR_ERROR FS_22latesttemp(struct one_wire_query *owq)
> {
> - return GB_to_Z_OR_E(OW_22latesttemp(&OWQ_F(owq), 1, PN(owq)));
> + return GB_to_Z_OR_E(OW_22latesttemp(&OWQ_F(owq), allow_85C, PN(owq)));
> }
>
> // use sibling function for fasttemp to keep cache value consistent
>
Thanks for finding this bug.
That's why it's important someone else does the tests. You don't find
hidden errors in code you wrote yourself.
Kind regards
Jan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
