On 28.04.2012 22:21, Jan-Christoph Borchardt wrote:
Not to open a can of worms (again),
lol
..[Github is more hip and better]..
Software freedom – and in this case the freedom of the software we use
for development – is just a means, not an end. Our goal is the freedom
of others, that of the people we make the software for. And that can
be achieved best& fastest by using Github and by leveraging a vast
range of enthusiastic developers& designers which are, as it is,
mostly on Github.
This discussion is the "vi or emacs" discussion of these days. What you
basically say is that for our goal to produce free software it does not
matter if the basics we use for that is free, as long its the best.
I heard that 100x and still I don't buy it. It's wrong. Freedom requires
freedom, its not working otherwise. Thought into an extreme, look how
nice github could harm free software by simply switching off. (Yes, I
also know that git is de-central, but still, you get the idea.
Apart from that, I am tired of the discussion of course and don't really
care from where I do git pull. The argument against our bugtracker
however does not count for me here.
regards,
Klaas
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Klaas Freitag<[email protected]> wrote:
On 27.04.2012 18:46, Georg Ehrke wrote:
Hi Georg,
btw. i was always interested why we use gitorious and not github?
I think (and hope) that is because gitorious is free software while github
is propietory. That is a value for us.
regards,
Klaas
_______________________________________________
Owncloud mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
_______________________________________________
Owncloud mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
