> You install it on your own server - it's open source. > Looks like it has been written in Rails.
Yes I have it on my own server. But repos are not available publicly. You have to have an account on it to even see the code. > PS: LOL they host their own code on github ;-) Hehe yes I noticed! Tom Tom Needham [email protected] On 30 Apr 2012, at 22:00, Thomas Müller wrote: > > Am Montag, dem 30.04.2012 um 22:56 schrieb Tom Needham: >>> I agree why not move to http://gitlabhq.com/ >>> It is Open source and a github like >> >> It does not offer public repos (afaik!). >> > > You install it on your own server - it's open source. > Looks like it has been written in Rails. > > Thomas > > PS: LOL they host their own code on github ;-) > >> Tom Needham >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> On 30 Apr 2012, at 21:56, Francois Lacroix wrote: >> >>> I agree why not move to http://gitlabhq.com/ >>> It is Open source and a github like >>> >>> On 30 avr. 2012, at 22:39, Tom Needham <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'd also like to see us move over to Github for our repository hosting and >>>> issue tracker. I think it would be hugely beneficial to have an integrated >>>> issue tracker, where we can reference commits easily. As Georg also said, >>>> we would get tracker for each repo which would really help keep things >>>> organised. >>>> >>>> The current bug tracker (although functional) leaves a lot to be desired, >>>> and with every update they seem to introduce a different bug. Just look at >>>> http://bugs.owncloud.org/thebuggenie/issues/my if you haven't already. The >>>> page load times are also becoming unacceptable. We need to make it as easy >>>> as possible to keep things organised! >>>> >>>> If we moved to Github we would not have to worry about these problems and >>>> the user management would be integrated. >>>> >>>> I know it will be a pain to move, but I think it will pay off with a much >>>> better workflow afterwards. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Tom >>>> >>>> Tom Needham >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> On 30 Apr 2012, at 15:49, Georg Ehrke wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> I can only agree to Jan. >>>>> >>>>> Am 28.04.2012 um 22:43 schrieb Klaas Freitag: >>>>> >>>>>> On 28.04.2012 22:21, Jan-Christoph Borchardt wrote: >>>>>>> Not to open a can of worms (again), >>>>>> lol >>>>>> >>>>>>> ..[Github is more hip and better].. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Software freedom – and in this case the freedom of the software we use >>>>>>> for development – is just a means, not an end. Our goal is the freedom >>>>>>> of others, that of the people we make the software for. And that can >>>>>>> be achieved best& fastest by using Github and by leveraging a vast >>>>>>> range of enthusiastic developers& designers which are, as it is, >>>>>>> mostly on Github. >>>>>> This discussion is the "vi or emacs" discussion of these days. What you >>>>>> basically say is that for our goal to produce free software it does not >>>>>> matter if the basics we use for that is free, as long its the best. >>>>>> >>>>>> I heard that 100x and still I don't buy it. It's wrong. Freedom requires >>>>>> freedom, >>>>> Linus actually hosted Linux on Github when kernel.org was down ;) >>>>>> its not working otherwise. Thought into an extreme, look how nice github >>>>>> could harm free software by simply switching off. >>>>> Gitorious could switch off as well. >>>>>> (Yes, I also know that git is de-central, but still, you get the idea. >>>>>> >>>>>> Apart from that, I am tired of the discussion of course and don't really >>>>>> care from where I do git pull. The argument against our bugtracker >>>>>> however does not count for me here. >>>>> I have to agree to Jan in this point too. Our Bugtracker works, but i >>>>> would appreciate github issues. >>>>> Further more we would have separated issue pages for the different >>>>> repositories. (core, apps, desktop client, android client) >>>>>> >>>>>> regards, >>>>>> Klaas >>>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Georg >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Klaas Freitag<[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 27.04.2012 18:46, Georg Ehrke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Georg, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> btw. i was always interested why we use gitorious and not github? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think (and hope) that is because gitorious is free software while >>>>>>>> github >>>>>>>> is propietory. That is a value for us. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Klaas >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Owncloud mailing list >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Owncloud mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Owncloud mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Owncloud mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
_______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
