I agree why not move to http://gitlabhq.com/ It is Open source and a github like
On 30 avr. 2012, at 22:39, Tom Needham <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd also like to see us move over to Github for our repository hosting and > issue tracker. I think it would be hugely beneficial to have an integrated > issue tracker, where we can reference commits easily. As Georg also said, we > would get tracker for each repo which would really help keep things > organised. > > The current bug tracker (although functional) leaves a lot to be desired, and > with every update they seem to introduce a different bug. Just look at > http://bugs.owncloud.org/thebuggenie/issues/my if you haven't already. The > page load times are also becoming unacceptable. We need to make it as easy as > possible to keep things organised! > > If we moved to Github we would not have to worry about these problems and the > user management would be integrated. > > I know it will be a pain to move, but I think it will pay off with a much > better workflow afterwards. > > Cheers, > Tom > > Tom Needham > [email protected] > > On 30 Apr 2012, at 15:49, Georg Ehrke wrote: > >> Hi, >> I can only agree to Jan. >> >> Am 28.04.2012 um 22:43 schrieb Klaas Freitag: >> >>> On 28.04.2012 22:21, Jan-Christoph Borchardt wrote: >>>> Not to open a can of worms (again), >>> lol >>> >>>> ..[Github is more hip and better].. >>>> >>>> Software freedom – and in this case the freedom of the software we use >>>> for development – is just a means, not an end. Our goal is the freedom >>>> of others, that of the people we make the software for. And that can >>>> be achieved best& fastest by using Github and by leveraging a vast >>>> range of enthusiastic developers& designers which are, as it is, >>>> mostly on Github. >>> This discussion is the "vi or emacs" discussion of these days. What you >>> basically say is that for our goal to produce free software it does not >>> matter if the basics we use for that is free, as long its the best. >>> >>> I heard that 100x and still I don't buy it. It's wrong. Freedom requires >>> freedom, >> Linus actually hosted Linux on Github when kernel.org was down ;) >>> its not working otherwise. Thought into an extreme, look how nice github >>> could harm free software by simply switching off. >> Gitorious could switch off as well. >>> (Yes, I also know that git is de-central, but still, you get the idea. >>> >>> Apart from that, I am tired of the discussion of course and don't really >>> care from where I do git pull. The argument against our bugtracker however >>> does not count for me here. >> I have to agree to Jan in this point too. Our Bugtracker works, but i would >> appreciate github issues. >> Further more we would have separated issue pages for the different >> repositories. (core, apps, desktop client, android client) >>> >>> regards, >>> Klaas >>> >> Cheers, >> Georg >>> >>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Klaas Freitag<[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On 27.04.2012 18:46, Georg Ehrke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Hi Georg, >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> btw. i was always interested why we use gitorious and not github? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I think (and hope) that is because gitorious is free software while github >>>>> is propietory. That is a value for us. >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> >>>>> Klaas >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Owncloud mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Owncloud mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud > > _______________________________________________ > Owncloud mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
_______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
