Am Montag, dem 30.04.2012 um 23:14 schrieb Georg Ehrke:
> Another good point for Github is,
> that a lot of 3rdparty projects we use are on github.
> So we can easily fork them and contribute bug fixes we fixed. So every 
> project profit by it.
>

Agreed with one exception: forking is a nightmare from a maintainers point of 
view.
The releases MUST be based on official release of 3rdparty projects.

We don't want to maintain and ship our own versions of 3rdparty libs!


Thomas

 
> (3rdparty projects on github: jquery, ace editor, full calendar, when, Sabre, 
> …)
> 
> Am 30.04.2012 um 22:56 schrieb Francois Lacroix:
> 
> > I agree why not move to http://gitlabhq.com/
> > It is Open source and a github like
> > 
> > On 30 avr. 2012, at 22:39, Tom Needham <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> >> I'd also like to see us move over to Github for our repository hosting and 
> >> issue tracker. I think it would be hugely beneficial to have an integrated 
> >> issue tracker, where we can reference commits easily. As Georg also said, 
> >> we would get tracker for each repo which would really help keep things 
> >> organised. 
> >> 
> >> The current bug tracker (although functional) leaves a lot to be desired, 
> >> and with every update they seem to introduce a different bug. Just look at 
> >> http://bugs.owncloud.org/thebuggenie/issues/my if you haven't already. The 
> >> page load times are also becoming unacceptable. We need to make it as easy 
> >> as possible to keep things organised! 
> >> 
> >> If we moved to Github we would not have to worry about these problems and 
> >> the user management would be integrated.
> >> 
> >> I know it will be a pain to move, but I think it will pay off with a much 
> >> better workflow afterwards.
> >> 
> >> Cheers,
> >> Tom
> >> 
> >> Tom Needham
> >> [email protected]
> >> 
> >> On 30 Apr 2012, at 15:49, Georg Ehrke wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Hi,
> >>> I can only agree to Jan.
> >>> 
> >>> Am 28.04.2012 um 22:43 schrieb Klaas Freitag:
> >>> 
> >>>> On 28.04.2012 22:21, Jan-Christoph Borchardt wrote:
> >>>>> Not to open a can of worms (again),
> >>>> lol
> >>>> 
> >>>>> ..[Github is more hip and better]..
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Software freedom – and in this case the freedom of the software we use
> >>>>> for development – is just a means, not an end. Our goal is the freedom
> >>>>> of others, that of the people we make the software for. And that can
> >>>>> be achieved best&  fastest by using Github and by leveraging a vast
> >>>>> range of enthusiastic developers&  designers which are, as it is,
> >>>>> mostly on Github.
> >>>> This discussion is the "vi or emacs" discussion of these days. What you 
> >>>> basically say is that for our goal to produce free software it does not 
> >>>> matter if the basics we use for that is free, as long its the best.
> >>>> 
> >>>> I heard that 100x and still I don't buy it. It's wrong. Freedom requires 
> >>>> freedom,
> >>> Linus actually hosted Linux on Github when kernel.org was down ;)
> >>>> its not working otherwise. Thought into an extreme, look how nice github 
> >>>> could harm free software by simply switching off.
> >>> Gitorious could switch off as well.
> >>>> (Yes, I also know that git is de-central, but still, you get the idea.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Apart from that, I am tired of the discussion of course and don't really 
> >>>> care from where I do git pull. The argument against our bugtracker 
> >>>> however does not count for me here.
> >>> I have to agree to Jan in this point too. Our Bugtracker works, but i 
> >>> would appreciate github issues.
> >>> Further more we would have separated issue pages for the different 
> >>> repositories. (core, apps, desktop client, android client)
> >>>> 
> >>>> regards,
> >>>> Klaas
> >>>> 
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Georg
> >>>> 
> >>>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Klaas Freitag<[email protected]>  
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 27.04.2012 18:46, Georg Ehrke wrote:
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Hi Georg,
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> btw. i was always interested why we use gitorious and not github?
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> I think (and hope) that is because gitorious is free software while 
> >>>>>> github
> >>>>>> is propietory. That is a value for us.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> regards,
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Klaas
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Owncloud mailing list
> >>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
> >>> 
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Owncloud mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Owncloud mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
> >
_______________________________________________
Owncloud mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud

Reply via email to