Does it even matter when for browser apps one of them is DOA?

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Scott Barnes <[email protected]>wrote:

> better, faster? .... O.o... did you just say JavaScript is better than
> WPF? .....
>
> ---
> Regards,
> Scott Barnes
> http://www.riagenic.com
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:02 AM, David Connors <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Scott Barnes <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> *Stares at XAML runtime*... *stares at WPF*... *stares at .NET
>>> Developers* ...i figure if all you really did was change the namespaces out
>>> and strip away the Windows 8 Start menu shit, you're back to Win7 and WPF
>>> crap would work..only devs would be clueless that the rendering pipeline
>>> was changed. except for those few devs who sit there and giggle themselves
>>> to sleep at the inner workings of what happens and what's different.
>>>
>>
>> If by 'crap would work' I agree ... *crap* would work, then I agree. The
>> web has won. Any rich app runtime is dead to me moving forward.
>>
>> As someone rightly said to me, MS spent the better part of a decade with
>> all this data binding stuff in WPF - then someone writes 10kb of javascript
>> that does the same thing better/faster.
>>
>> I mean, unrealengine in a browser with no plugins.
>>
>>
>>
>> David Connors
>> [email protected] | M +61 417 189 363
>> Download my v-card: https://www.codify.com/cards/davidconnors
>> Follow me on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/davidconnors
>> Connect with me on LinkedIn: http://au.linkedin.com/in/davidjohnconnors
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to