David: I think the words your seeking are "JavaScript Stockholm Syndrome" .. I object strongly to a language who's surrounded by frameworks that are hell bent on abstracting developers from the said language as much as possible because the said language is so far behind the evolution curve. Had JS moved to ECMA4 - ECMA6 ..sure.. i'll play along but this JS ciricle jerk that's going on because everyone's given the "defeatist" attitude... bleh...
And yes, I will concede I see my future with me standing on the roadside way "WILL CODE JS FOR CRACK"... --- Regards, Scott Barnes http://www.riagenic.com On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:23 AM, David Connors <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Scott Barnes <[email protected]>wrote: > >> better, faster? .... O.o... did you just say JavaScript is better than >> WPF? ..... >> > > I said 'someone's 10kb of JS is better. > > JavaScript is just Internet assembly language. It's the frameworks that > matter. > > I used to hate JS with a passion, but the momentum around it is undeniable > and the things people accomplish with frameworks on top of it are > staggering. > > David Connors > [email protected] | M +61 417 189 363 > Download my v-card: https://www.codify.com/cards/davidconnors > Follow me on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/davidconnors > Connect with me on LinkedIn: http://au.linkedin.com/in/davidjohnconnors > > >
