either all - does it matter either way? In closing - JavaScript is the digital age’s version of herpes, every time you think its gone a new outbreak occurs – DHTML, AJAX, “HTML5″
--- Regards, Scott Barnes http://www.riagenic.com On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Craig van Nieuwkerk <[email protected]>wrote: > Does it even matter when for browser apps one of them is DOA? > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Scott Barnes <[email protected]>wrote: > >> better, faster? .... O.o... did you just say JavaScript is better than >> WPF? ..... >> >> --- >> Regards, >> Scott Barnes >> http://www.riagenic.com >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:02 AM, David Connors <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Scott Barnes <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> *Stares at XAML runtime*... *stares at WPF*... *stares at .NET >>>> Developers* ...i figure if all you really did was change the namespaces out >>>> and strip away the Windows 8 Start menu shit, you're back to Win7 and WPF >>>> crap would work..only devs would be clueless that the rendering pipeline >>>> was changed. except for those few devs who sit there and giggle themselves >>>> to sleep at the inner workings of what happens and what's different. >>>> >>> >>> If by 'crap would work' I agree ... *crap* would work, then I agree. >>> The web has won. Any rich app runtime is dead to me moving forward. >>> >>> As someone rightly said to me, MS spent the better part of a decade with >>> all this data binding stuff in WPF - then someone writes 10kb of javascript >>> that does the same thing better/faster. >>> >>> I mean, unrealengine in a browser with no plugins. >>> >>> >>> >>> David Connors >>> [email protected] | M +61 417 189 363 >>> Download my v-card: https://www.codify.com/cards/davidconnors >>> Follow me on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/davidconnors >>> Connect with me on LinkedIn: http://au.linkedin.com/in/davidjohnconnors >>> >>> >> >
