http://xkcd.com/378/

Sent from my flux capacitor. Please excuse brevity and any odd autocorrect
errors.
On 14/02/2014 12:28 PM, "Stephen Price" <step...@perthprojects.com> wrote:

> Great point Greg.
>
> There was a time where I didn't feel like a real programmer because I
> wasn't writing my code in C++ and then one day I realised that the C++
> programmers were not real programmers because they were not writing their
> code in Assembly Language... and the Assembly Language programmers were not
> programmers as they were not using modifying binary directly on the hard
> disk... etc.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:00 AM, GregAtGregLowDotCom <g...@greglow.com>wrote:
>
>> Isn’t it all just perspective ?
>>
>>
>>
>> All other languages are just wrappers around machine code anyway. J
>>
>>
>>
>> “Resistance is futile”
>>
>>
>>
>> “Any problem in computing can be solved by another layer of abstraction.
>> And any performance problem in computing can be solved by removing one
>> layer of abstraction.”
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Greg
>>
>>
>>
>> Dr Greg Low
>>
>>
>>
>> 1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913fax
>>
>> SQL Down Under | Web: www.sqldownunder.com
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
>> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Scott Barnes
>> *Sent:* Friday, 14 February 2014 11:42 AM
>> *To:* ozDotNet
>> *Subject:* Re: Advice to Microsoft (not mine - the IT press and
>> developer blogosphere)
>>
>>
>>
>> David: I think the words your seeking are "JavaScript Stockholm Syndrome"
>> .. I object strongly to a language who's surrounded by frameworks that are
>> hell bent on abstracting developers from the said language as much as
>> possible because the said language is so far behind the evolution curve.
>> Had JS moved to ECMA4 - ECMA6 ..sure.. i'll play along but this JS ciricle
>> jerk that's going on because everyone's given the "defeatist" attitude...
>> bleh...
>>
>>
>>
>> And yes, I will concede I see my future with me standing on the roadside
>> way "WILL CODE JS FOR CRACK"...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Regards,
>> Scott Barnes
>> http://www.riagenic.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:23 AM, David Connors <da...@connors.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Scott Barnes <scott.bar...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> better, faster? .... O.o... did you just say JavaScript is better than
>> WPF? .....
>>
>>
>>
>> I said 'someone's 10kb of JS is better.
>>
>>
>>
>> JavaScript is just Internet assembly language. It's the frameworks that
>> matter.
>>
>>
>>
>> I used to hate JS with a passion, but the momentum around it is
>> undeniable and the things people accomplish with frameworks on top of it
>> are staggering.
>>
>>
>> David Connors
>> da...@connors.com | M +61 417 189 363
>> Download my v-card: https://www.codify.com/cards/davidconnors
>> Follow me on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/davidconnors
>> Connect with me on LinkedIn: http://au.linkedin.com/in/davidjohnconnors
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to