Yeah, I was limiting it to the level of the microprocessor. No interest in 
actually building or coding inside there nowadays.

 

Regards,

 

Greg

 

Dr Greg Low

 

1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913 fax 

SQL Down Under | Web:  <http://www.sqldownunder.com/> www.sqldownunder.com

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On 
Behalf Of Craig van Nieuwkerk
Sent: Friday, 14 February 2014 1:11 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Advice to Microsoft (not mine - the IT press and developer 
blogosphere)

 

Where's my soldering iron...

 

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Preet Sangha <preetsan...@gmail.com 
<mailto:preetsan...@gmail.com> > wrote:

Greg.

 

All machine languages are just wrappers for microcode 

 

Preet

 

On 14 February 2014 14:00, GregAtGregLowDotCom <g...@greglow.com 
<mailto:g...@greglow.com> > wrote:

Isn’t it all just perspective ? 

 

All other languages are just wrappers around machine code anyway. :)

 

“Resistance is futile”

 

“Any problem in computing can be solved by another layer of abstraction. And 
any performance problem in computing can be solved by removing one layer of 
abstraction.”

 

Regards,

 

Greg

 

Dr Greg Low

 

1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 <tel:%2B61%20419201410>  
mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913 <tel:%2B61%203%208676%204913>  fax 

SQL Down Under | Web:  <http://www.sqldownunder.com/> www.sqldownunder.com

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com>  
[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> ] 
On Behalf Of Scott Barnes
Sent: Friday, 14 February 2014 11:42 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Advice to Microsoft (not mine - the IT press and developer 
blogosphere)

 

David: I think the words your seeking are "JavaScript Stockholm Syndrome" .. I 
object strongly to a language who's surrounded by frameworks that are hell bent 
on abstracting developers from the said language as much as possible because 
the said language is so far behind the evolution curve. Had JS moved to ECMA4 - 
ECMA6 ..sure.. i'll play along but this JS ciricle jerk that's going on because 
everyone's given the "defeatist" attitude... bleh... 

 

And yes, I will concede I see my future with me standing on the roadside way 
"WILL CODE JS FOR CRACK"... 

 

 

 




---
Regards,
Scott Barnes
http://www.riagenic.com

 

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:23 AM, David Connors <da...@connors.com 
<mailto:da...@connors.com> > wrote:

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Scott Barnes <scott.bar...@gmail.com 
<mailto:scott.bar...@gmail.com> > wrote:

better, faster? .... O.o... did you just say JavaScript is better than WPF? 
.....

 

I said 'someone's 10kb of JS is better.

 

JavaScript is just Internet assembly language. It's the frameworks that matter. 

 

I used to hate JS with a passion, but the momentum around it is undeniable and 
the things people accomplish with frameworks on top of it are staggering. 




David Connors
 <mailto:da...@connors.com> da...@connors.com | M +61 417 189 363 
<tel:%2B61%20417%20189%20363> 
Download my v-card: https://www.codify.com/cards/davidconnors
Follow me on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/davidconnors
Connect with me on LinkedIn: http://au.linkedin.com/in/davidjohnconnors

 

 

 





 

-- 
regards,
Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland 

 

<<image001.gif>>

Reply via email to