Yea I get that. That's why I said it depends who's at the other end. Tbh
I'm pretty sick of recruiters. They are a dime a dozen. I think at one
stage about 20% of my linked list was recruiters. My thinking was that I
might need them one day. But I have culled them significantly, down to a
few remaining agents that I believe add value. I don't often start with
recruiters when I'm looking for work, they take too much of a cut for
adding very little value.

On Wed, 2 Jun 2021, 9:17 pm DotNet Dude, <adotnetd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Tony,
>
> Tom’s original question was about the recruiter asking for this info which
> is quite different from the bank you’re working for. Financial institutions
> do ask for the things you mention but I’d be suspicious and hesitant to
> pass info like that to a silly old recruiter.
>
> I’ve never been comfortable with systems like WorkPro, particularly with
> credit files, which they let you just download as a PDF so the recruiter
> can easily forward. Not cool at all.
>
> The whole recruitment model and the systems they use really needs a revamp
> to protect user privacy and security. I’m not convinced they are secure.
>
>
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 20:33, Tony Wright <tonyw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Really? At the bank I have had sign over a right for them to receive
>> every contact note for any shares I buy or sell. I also have to submit
>> requests to buy or sell shares. That's an Apra requirement. I'm also not
>> allowed to have directorships in more than one company, and it has to be an
>> approved directorship. So it really does depend on who it is and what it
>> means to you. A credit check to ensure that you aren't susceptible to
>> bribery might be reasonable too depending on who it is. If it's some random
>> numpty, sure, tell them to get stuffed, but some places really do need
>> extra checks on their staff.
>>
>> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021, 8:25 pm David Connors, <da...@connors.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Personally, I'd decline given the circumstances you've described. It
>>> would be like asking for this information from an employee and
>>> inappropriate if not probably illegal in the context of an FTE.
>>>
>>> David Connors
>>> da...@connors.com | M +61 417 189 363
>>> Telegram: https://t.me/davidconnors
>>> LinkedIn: http://au.linkedin.com/in/davidjohnconnors
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 19:20, Tom P <tompbi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes as an individual contractor so I did find it very odd. I’ve asked
>>>> for a reason so let’s see what they come back with.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 19:06, David Connors <da...@connors.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If you're doing this as an individual contractor on a work for hire /
>>>>> hourly basis then this is pretty strange.
>>>>>
>>>>> Even as a company, we almost always decline disclosure of financial
>>>>> information on the basis that we're privately held and send whoever is
>>>>> asking a letter of solvency from our tax accountants instead (they just
>>>>> want to know we're not going to go bust - but that's a very strange
>>>>> consideration if you're an individual contractor).
>>>>>
>>>>> David Connors
>>>>> da...@connors.com | M +61 417 189 363
>>>>> Telegram: https://t.me/davidconnors
>>>>> LinkedIn: http://au.linkedin.com/in/davidjohnconnors
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 18:32, Tom P <tompbi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi folks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For the experienced contractors here who may know...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am in the process of starting a new contract and the recruitment
>>>>>> agent has requested access to my credit file (via WorkPro). Is this 
>>>>>> normal?
>>>>>> I’ve only had one contract in the past and the credit check was not done
>>>>>> AFAIK.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My credit file is clean so that’s not an issue but it contains
>>>>>> sensitive information such as my credit card limits, etc, so I’m hesitant
>>>>>> to release it unless absolutely necessary.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any info would be appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> Tom
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Tom
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to