|
Hi
Robyn,
I'm
sorry if it seemed as though I was judging. I will try to explain what I was
trying to say.
It's a
very complex decision to make regarding testing, because it implies that you
will terminate if the baby has cystic fibrosis. I suppose a pregnancy is only a
potential life, as even without any inherited or congenital disorders, and
despite all the tests and treatments available, there are no guarantees of a
perfect outcome.
I am a
Maternal and Child Health Nurse, so know a little about Cystic Fibrosis from
working with families who have experienced it. I know that there are varying
degrees of severity, with some people living well into their fifties while
others don't make it very far at all.
I
think it would be hard to terminate a pregnancy for me after having one child
with any abnormality as you have a relationship with that child, not the
abnormality. Terminating a subsequent pregnancy for me would be a tragic
decision to make (not saying at all that I wouldn't make that decision). It
would be easier I think if I hadn't had a child because you would not know what
you were losing, although you might appreciate what grief you may be avoiding. I
hope that your niece and sister do have some joy in their lives, and that your
niece's condition improves.
Nicole.
|
- [ozmidwifery] CF screening Robyn Dempsey
- RE: [ozmidwifery] CF screening Megan & Larry
- Re: [ozmidwifery] CF screening Susan Cudlipp
- RE: [ozmidwifery] CF screening Nicole Carver
- Re: [ozmidwifery] CF screening Janet Fraser
- RE: [ozmidwifery] CF screening Vedrana Valčić
- [ozmidwifery] CF screening Robyn Dempsey
- Re: [ozmidwifery] CF screening Judy Chapman
- RE: [ozmidwifery] CF screening Ken WArd
- Re: [ozmidwifery] CF screening Susan Cudlipp
- Re: [ozmidwifery] CF screening Jenny Cameron
- RE: [ozmidwifery] CF screening Vedrana Valčić
