Many doctors have been saying for many years
that they are not swayed by pharmaceuticals advertising/giveaways/education
sponsorhips. If there is not a substantial financial benefit to these companies
– why do they use these tactics? Because they are in business and
wouldn’t spend the money if they didn’t see a business benefit to
them. Not so long ago these companies used to give hospitals the ABM (artificial
baby milk) free – why? Not because they were philanthropists but because
they knew that parents would go out and buy what they saw in the hospital
(because that MUST be best) SO they knew this would boost their business market
and hence profit. These companies are clever marketers and they know how
to put their brand name in front of us – education sessions are an
important advertising strategy. They are a subtle way to get around the WHO
Code principles. Who pays for the education if a
manufacturer of artificial baby milk is sponsoring the education? Parents! I believe we, personally, and our employers
need to be responsible for our education not manufacturers of artificial baby
milk and certainly not parents. Instead of sponsoring education
programmes for health professionals why don’t they lower the price to
parents who have made the choice to artificially feed? Or, why don’t
they send the money anonymously for the use of education of health
professionals involved in infant feeding? Because this is an ADVERTISING tactic
(and probably tax deductible). Why not find an independent dietician or
other health professional to educate us on the pros and cons of the various
brands? Why not ask our hospital’s dietician to research these products
and give us an education session? I believe that health professionals need
to stand up and say NO to being educated by any particular ABM/pharmaceutical
manufacturer. Many of us don’t believe doctors should be wined,
dined and supported in any monetary form by pharmaceutical companies –
why would we think that educational events are any different? Pharmaceutical
companies use various tactics dependent on the market or country they are in
and what latitude they are allowed. We can already see the limits being
pushed by a particular company with their ‘toddler milk’ advertising
– they are beginning to sneak under the radar and we must once again
become vigilant! Sponsored education sessions may seem
innocent in themselves but we do need to remember that breastmilk lacks the
backing money that these companies can afford. This lack is the
reason why the WHO Code was initiated in the first place and why there is a
need to be vigilant. Shaughn
|
- Re: [ozmidwifery] was I need to vent... jesse/jayne
- Re: [ozmidwifery] was I need to ... Barbara Glare & Chris Bright
- Re: [ozmidwifery] was I need... Jackie Kitschke
- Re: [ozmidwifery] was I need... Barbara Glare & Chris Bright
- Re: [ozmidwifery] was I need... Jackie Kitschke
- Re: [ozmidwifery] was I need to ... Andrea Quanchi
- RE: [ozmidwifery] was I need... Kelly @ BellyBelly
- Re: [ozmidwifery] was I need... Barbara Glare & Chris Bright
- Re: [ozmidwifery] was I need... Helen and Graham
- Re: [ozmidwifery] was I need... Pinky McKay
- RE: [ozmidwifery] was I need... Shaughn Leach
- Re: [ozmidwifery] was I need... Barbara Glare & Chris Bright
- RE: [ozmidwifery] was I need... Shaughn Leach
- RE: [ozmidwifery] I need to vent!!! Roberta Quinn
- [ozmidwifery] hep B at birth Kristin Beckedahl
- RE: [ozmidwifery] hep B at birth Megan & Larry
- Re: [ozmidwifery] hep B at b... suzi and brett
- Re: [ozmidwifery] hep B at birth Dan & Rachael Austin
- RE: [ozmidwifery] hep B at b... Nicole Carver
- Re: [ozmidwifery] hep B at birth Janet Fraser
- [ozmidwifery] Do Doulas need insuran... Kristin Beckedahl