Is there another competitor for UDT or approaches similar to using reliable UDP
are losing value?VikramDate: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:21:00 -0700From: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]: RE: [p2p-hackers] UDT?To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] likely dead-end; just
guessing though.Serguei Osokine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday, July
12, 2007 David Barrett wrote:> There was a brief discussion of it on 1/25/2005
here; hope that> it is still in the archive...Best wishes -S.Osokine.12 Jul
2007.-----Original Message-----From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of David BarrettSent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 3:06 AMTo: 'theory and practice
of decentralized computer networks'Subject: [p2p-hackers] UDT?Has anybody used
the UDT library (udt.sourceforge.net)? Stands for"UDP-based Data Transfer
Protocol".Somehow I only learned of it moments ago, but it looks like it might
havesaved me an incredible amount of work building my own
congestion-controlprotocol. (Or, like many libraries, perhaps it would have
just been anotherdead end before I eventually decided to write it myself
anyway.)-david_______________________________________________p2p-hackers
mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackersYou
don't get no juice unless you squeezeLemon Obrien, the
Third.http://www.tamago.us
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
