DCCP is cool, except for the commands needed to be sent back and forth. when
you see the solution where you continually send a command cause of the unsure
nature of udp; you realize a time based solution between connections, using
the data you calc, is better.
David Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DCCP is pretty nice, I agree. I modeled a lot of my protocol on it.
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 9:15 pm, Adam Fisk wrote:
> For UDP congestion control, have you checked out DCCP? There's more
> info at:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/dccp-charter.html
>
> -Adam
>
> On 7/12/07, David Barrett wrote:
>
>> Has anybody used the UDT library ( udt.sourceforge.net)? Stands for
>> "UDP-based Data Transfer Protocol".
>>
>> Somehow I only learned of it moments ago, but it looks like it might
>> have saved me an incredible amount of work building my own
>> congestion-control protocol. (Or, like many libraries, perhaps it
>> would have just been another dead end before I eventually decided to
>> write it myself anyway.)
>>
>> -david
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2p-hackers mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
>
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
You don't get no juice unless you squeeze
Lemon Obrien, the Third.
http://www.tamago.us
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
