UDT is not hard to implement...
no firewall send rpc messages.
and udp in a controlled environment is fairly reliable; its 98/99 percent
reliable over the regular internet.
Vikram Dham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
P { margin:0px; padding:0px } body { FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma } Is there another competitor for UDT or approaches
similar to using reliable UDP are losing value?
Vikram
---------------------------------
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:21:00 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [p2p-hackers] UDT?
To: [email protected]
most likely dead-end; just guessing though.
Serguei Osokine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday, July 12, 2007 David
Barrett wrote:
> There was a brief discussion of it on 1/25/2005 here; hope that
> it is still in the archive...
Best wishes -
S.Osokine.
12 Jul 2007.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Barrett
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 3:06 AM
To: 'theory and practice of decentralized computer networks'
Subject: [p2p-hackers] UDT?
Has anybody used the UDT library (udt.sourceforge.net)? Stands for
"UDP-based Data Transfer Protocol".
Somehow I only learned of it moments ago, but it looks like it might have
saved me an incredible amount of work building my own congestion-control
protocol. (Or, like many libraries, perhaps it would have just been another
dead end before I eventually decided to write it myself anyway.)
-david
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
You don't get no juice unless you squeeze
Lemon Obrien, the Third.
http://www.tamago.us_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
You don't get no juice unless you squeeze
Lemon Obrien, the Third.
http://www.tamago.us_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
