On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 00:05 +0100, Changaco wrote: > Let me get this straight, someone writes a message asking people not to > go into political debates that have been done over and over, but you do > it anyway. > > This is exactly why I previously said I wasn't going to argue with you, > because from your messages here and a quick look at your website I > guessed what you were going to say. > > I agree with Ted Smith on the uselessness of the "debate" you are > trying to fuel, therefore I won't participate.
This debate has only one possible use: it can motivate people to test hypotheses related to economics on p2p networks. So far, I've seen a great deal of that in this thread, and I hope I can see more. Not only is that constructive and on-topic, it's the best way to have the underlying political debate: through a solid basis of empiricism. -- Sent from Ubuntu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
