https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2443717



--- Comment #25 from Neal Gompa <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Tarulia from comment #24)
> (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #23)
> > The suffix would be stripped during rpmbuild time,
> > and the result are mutually conflicting packages where you have to pick one
> > or the other for the application being built.
> 
> I guess this is adjacent to the solution I proposed above, but that carries
> the same problem: It wouldn't matter for packaging because packagers can
> just pick one or the other. But Developers couldn't install both in parallel
> to build/test against both toolkits, or to use for different projects. 
> 
> The alternatives way leaves that option open. The one downside is that this
> requires root access. But chances are a developer already has that, or the
> sysadmin could set up sudoers to allow usage of alternatives.

Admittedly, the conflict mainly comes from wx-config. I'm also kind of iffy
about having our default toolkit be GTK3 given that it's a dead-end toolkit,
but I'm also cognizant that wxQt is relatively new... I'd rather everyone be
forced to be explicit about this, but the developer thing is a good point.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2443717

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202443717%23c25

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Reply via email to