https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2443717
--- Comment #35 from Scott Talbert <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Tarulia from comment #33) > However, because they are not linked, it would easily be possible for users > to end up with any combination of the 5. For example `wx-config` from > wxQt3.4 and `wxrc` from wxBase3.2, or `wx-config` from wxGTK3.2 with `wxrc` > from 3.4. I don't imagine that would go very well. I'm not sure it's a big enough issue if wx-config is mismatched with wxrc to add even more complexity? Let's see what Neal says about whether he really wants to get rid of alternatives or not. > I'm by no means an expert on `alternatives` (I finally found out today how > to actually choose one …), but I believe that is what the `--follower` > options are for? I don't think it makes sense for them to be chosen > individually. Interesting, I'd never heard of the follower option before either. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2443717 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202443717%23c35 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
